In Death Scenes, a black-and-white photograph titled "Billie O'Shannon killed by Marie Woods over a marijuana cigarette" captures a chilling moment of tragedy. The victim, Miss Lillian May Akers, a 22-year-old waitress from Modesto, California, was known by her alias, Billie Maureen O'Shannon. She was killed by Miss Frances Marie Woods, a 25-year-old nurse from Bakersfield, residing at 1660 D Street. The seemingly minor dispute over a marijuana cigarette escalated into fatal violence. The story behind this photograph, the result of extensive research into 1938 newspaper archives, reveals the grim and tragic outcome of a brief but intense conflict between the two women. The facts, meticulously gathered from period news reports, highlight the darkness that could erupt from seemingly mundane situations.
April 6, 1938:
The tragic story began at dawn on April 6, 1938, when police discovered Miss Frances Marie Woods crouched on a sidewalk beside her roadster, seemingly rendering aid to an unconscious blonde woman. The woman was Miss Billie Maureen O'Shannon, later identified as Lillian May Akers. Woods, covered in blood, was attempting to bind the victim's grievous wounds, her hands desperately trying to stop the bleeding from a severe abdominal gash.
As officers approached, they realized the extent of the violence. O'Shannon had sustained multiple deep cuts across her body. She was rushed to General Hospital in critical condition, but upon closer examination, her injuries were even more horrifying. The victim had a fifteen-inch slash wound in her abdomen, so deep that it nearly disemboweled her. In addition, she suffered multiple other gashes: another in her abdomen, a deep wound to her chest, and a severe cut across her throat. The brutality of the injuries painted a grim picture of the violence that had occurred that night.
After receiving a much-needed blood transfusion, doctors were cautiously optimistic about Billie Maureen O'Shannon's chances of survival. Her condition stabilized, and on April 6, she regained consciousness. In an interview with police, O'Shannon identified her attacker as Miss Frances Marie Woods, the Bakersfield nurse who had been found at the scene. According to O'Shannon, Woods attacked her with a large knife while they were riding in Woods' car. The reason for the attack, O'Shannon claimed, was her refusal to smoke a marijuana cigarette offered by Woods.
However, police doubted that the refusal to smoke the "devil weed," as marijuana was colloquially called, was the true motive behind the vicious assault. Investigators questioned O'Shannon's friends and learned that the two women had met at the café where O'Shannon worked as a waitress, before heading out for a drive together in Woods' automobile.
Detective Huston, who led the investigation, searched Woods' belongings and uncovered a pocket knife in her purse, as well as dried blood on her hands. Despite the evidence, Woods denied being the one who had attacked O'Shannon. Nonetheless, she was arrested and booked on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder.
When taken into custody, Woods had $198 in cash, and her luxurious roadster was parked at the curb. Investigators found a first-aid kit in the car, which had been opened. The adhesive tape from the kit matched the tape used to cover the large slash on O'Shannon’s abdomen, further tying Woods to the scene. Woods admitted that the first-aid kit, from which she had taken bandages to try to stop the bleeding, belonged to her.
Detective Lieutenants W.E. Huston and W. Gilliland, who led the investigation, reported that Frances Marie Woods continuously denied being the assailant despite mounting evidence against her. During her arrest, Woods grew increasingly agitated, even lashing out by kicking at press photographers and doing her best to hide her face from the cameras. Her denials persisted until officers took her to the hospital, where her alleged victim, Billie Maureen O'Shannon, lay gravely injured, still weakened from significant blood loss.
At the hospital, O'Shannon was able to directly confront Woods from her bed, verbally confirming the nurse's identity as her attacker. O'Shannon retold the story of the attack in detail, recounting how she first met Woods in a beer parlor where she worked as a waitress. She said that after their initial meeting, they went to Woods' apartment and sat in the nurse’s car, where an argument ensued. Later, the two went for a ride, and it was during this drive that Woods offered O'Shannon a marijuana cigarette, which she refused to smoke. O'Shannon reportedly told Woods that "anybody who smoked marijuana was crazy," prompting a heated exchange. Woods allegedly threatened her, saying that if she didn’t smoke the cigarette, she would get hurt. The situation escalated into a physical struggle, during which Woods pulled out a knife and viciously slashed and stabbed O'Shannon multiple times.
Faced with this direct accusation, Woods finally admitted to wielding the knife but refused to explain her motive for the brutal attack. She provided officers with her address, 1669 D Street in Bakersfield, and revealed that she had been staying at a hotel at Fifth and Main Street in Modesto. According to Police Captain Stanley Stone, Woods, a brunette nurse, later led investigators to a hardware store where she had purchased the bloodstained knife. She told police she had been drawn to the weapon because of its "pretty carving and long, shining blade." The knife was found in her purse, further solidifying her connection to the crime.
Frances Marie Woods' bail was set at $25,000 by Municipal Judge LeRoy Dawson, a significant amount due to the severity of the charges she faced. Judge Dawson made it clear that if Billie Maureen O'Shannon did not survive her injuries, the charges against Woods would be upgraded to murder. Unable to post the high bail, Woods was remanded to County Jail, where she would remain in custody. A preliminary hearing on the charges was scheduled for April 19, setting the stage for the legal proceedings that would determine her fate.
April 8, 1938 & April 15, 1938:
On April 8, 1938, Billie Maureen O'Shannon underwent a major operation at General Hospital, as her condition had drastically worsened, giving doctors little hope for her survival. Despite their efforts, on April 15, O'Shannon succumbed to the severe knife wounds inflicted upon her a week earlier. In a poignant moment before her passing, Frances Marie Woods was allowed to see O'Shannon one final time at the hospital. Expressing deep remorse, Woods reportedly told her, "I would like to change places with you, honey. I would rather be in your place than mine."
The gravity of the situation escalated the following day, as District Attorney Buron Fitts announced that the charges against Woods would be elevated to murder due to O'Shannon's death. Plans for O'Shannon’s funeral service initially set for Edward Brothers' Colonial Mortuary were changed, with services held at Sovern Funeral Home. A mass for the repose of her soul was offered at St. Stanislaus' Catholic Church, followed by her interment at St. Stanislaus Cemetery.
April 19, 1938:
At the inquest into the tragic death of Billie Maureen O'Shannon, Mrs. Elsie Loveday, a close friend, and Elizabeth Scott, O'Shannon's roommate, were visibly shaken as they listened to the harrowing details recounted by witnesses. As the evidence unfolded, emotions ran high, and both women struggled to contain their grief over the brutal circumstances surrounding O'Shannon’s death. Frances Marie Woods was formally charged with the knife slaying when she was arraigned in municipal court based on the district attorney's complaint. During the inquest, Woods denied O'Shannon's account of the events, creating further tension in the courtroom. Judge LeRoy Fawson scheduled a preliminary hearing for April 25, remanding Woods to jail without the possibility of bail. There were indications that the nurse might mount an insanity defense when the trial commenced.
The connection between Woods and O'Shannon began at the cafe where O'Shannon worked as a waitress. The two women had quickly formed a friendship and attended a party together on the same evening of the tragic incident. However, their camaraderie took a dark turn when, just an hour later, police received frantic calls from local residents reporting a violent altercation between the two women in the street. When law enforcement arrived at the scene, they found Woods bent over O'Shannon’s unconscious body, desperately trying to stop the bleeding from multiple stab wounds.
In a startling discovery, police located a bloody pocket knife in Woods’ purse, along with $197 in cash, while two additional knives were found in her vehicle. Despite her emotional state, Woods reportedly admitted to having wielded the knife, which she claimed to have purchased just days prior because she found its blade appealing. However, she offered no explanation for her actions. Witnesses noted that, aside from her hysteria, Woods appeared to be sober and in a seemingly normal state. After regaining consciousness, O'Shannon was presented with Woods, and without hesitation, identified her as the individual who had offered her a marijuana cigarette, often referred to as a "reefer," prior to the violent confrontation.
A coroner's jury determined that Billie Maureen O'Shannon had been stabbed to death by Frances Marie Woods with homicidal intent after O'Shannon refused to smoke a marijuana cigarette. Detective Lieutenant W.E. Huston testified before the jury, recounting the early morning hours of April 6, when he found Woods bent over O'Shannon's unconscious body. Woods, holding an open, blood-stained knife, reportedly confessed to Huston, saying, "I did the cutting, here is the knife." Upon searching Woods' nearby automobile, officers discovered two additional large knives in the glove compartment, further implicating her.
Officer Mike E. Ryan added to the testimony by describing his interview with O'Shannon at General Hospital. After regaining consciousness, O'Shannon identified Woods as her assailant and explained that the attack stemmed from a quarrel over her refusal to smoke a "marijuana reefer." O'Shannon had reportedly told Ryan, "Frances wanted me to smoke a marijuana reefer, and I said, 'I won't, and furthermore, anyone who does smoke them ought to get a punch in the nose.'" In response, Woods sarcastically asked, "Would you like to take a punch at my jaw?" The confrontation escalated when Woods stopped the car, forced O'Shannon out, and then proceeded to slash her multiple times with a knife.
The brutal attack occurred in the 600 block of East 28th Street, leaving O'Shannon with severe wounds. John De Quattro, a cafe manager and Miss O'Shannon's employer, at 2900 South San Pedro Street, testified that earlier that night, both women, along with De Quattro and his friend Leo Prieto, had been drinking at his cafe and later at his apartment. This social gathering preceded the violent altercation that led to O'Shannon's tragic death.
The question of whether a few puffs from a marijuana cigarette transformed Frances Marie Woods, a seemingly mild-mannered nurse, into a violent murderer puzzled police investigators as they worked to piece together the chain of events leading to the brutal stabbing of Billie Maureen O'Shannon. The possibility that Woods had been under the influence of marijuana during the attack became a focal point in the investigation, though it remained unclear if drugs played a role in the crime. John De Quattro, who was present at the gathering before the stabbing, denied that any marijuana had been smoked that night. He testified that Woods had only smoked a Mexican cigarette filled with strong black tobacco, contradicting the notion that marijuana had been involved.
Captain Eddie Chitwood, head of the police narcotics squad, also weighed in, stating that investigators had not yet determined if Woods had been under the influence of marijuana at the time of the attack. "The only thing that seems certain," Chitwood remarked, "is that she must have been under the influence of something to have committed such a vicious crime." The brutal nature of the assault, combined with Woods' erratic behavior and the knife wounds inflicted upon O'Shannon, led investigators to consider whether drugs or another substance had played a role in triggering the violence. However, the lack of conclusive evidence left the question unanswered as authorities continued to gather evidence that could potentially lead to Woods' imprisonment or even the death penalty.
Deputy District Attorney J. Miller Leavy announced that a formal complaint charging Frances Marie Woods with murder would soon be issued. The severity of the charges came after the death of Billie Maureen O'Shannon, who succumbed to the numerous stab wounds inflicted upon her by Woods. As the legal proceedings began to take shape, all eyes were on Woods, whose demeanor remained guarded.
Appearing in public dressed in a checkered blue coat, a dark skirt, and a silk blouse, Miss Woods notably recoiled from the attention of photographers. Shying away from the press, she attempted to shield her face, avoiding the cameras as much as possible. Despite the mounting evidence against her, including the witness testimony from O'Shannon and the discovery of the bloodied knife, Woods remained evasive and silent on her motivations, adding to the air of mystery surrounding the crime.
April 25, 1938:
On April 25, Frances Marie Woods was formally ordered to be held without bail for trial in superior court, facing charges of first-degree murder in the case of Billie Maureen O'Shannon. This decision came after a preliminary hearing presided over by Municipal Judge Newcomb Condee, during which Woods' attorneys argued that she should be charged with manslaughter instead of murder. Despite their pleas, the evidence presented indicated a more severe charge was warranted.
During the preliminary hearing, Detective Lieutenant J.A. Donohue provided crucial testimony regarding the events leading up to O'Shannon's fatal injuries. He recounted how, upon discovering O'Shannon gravely wounded, she managed to communicate with him, revealing details about her interactions with Woods. O'Shannon described how they had been driving together when the topic of a marijuana cigarette arose, suggesting that this conversation played a pivotal role in the altercation that followed. The discussion surrounding the marijuana cigarette set the stage for a volatile confrontation, ultimately leading to the tragic outcome of O'Shannon's death.
As the proceedings unfolded, the gravity of the situation became increasingly apparent. The court was tasked with determining the nature of Woods' culpability in this tragic incident, weighing the defense's assertions against the damning testimony of witnesses and law enforcement officials. The community remained on edge, following the case closely as it progressed toward trial.
July 12, 1938:
As the trial of Frances Marie Woods commenced, a jury was quickly selected to hear the murder charge against her. Through her attorney, Donald McKay, Woods indicated her intention to assert a defense of self-defense, claiming that the confrontation with Billie Maureen O'Shannon was initiated by the young waitress. According to this narrative, the quarrel escalated to a point where O'Shannon sustained injuries that ultimately led to her tragic death. Within less than an hour, a jury was impaneled in the courtroom of Superior Judge A.A. Scott, comprising two women and ten men, ready to delve into the details of the case.
The trial began with minimal delay as both sides prepared to present their arguments. Miss Woods, displaying a level of confidence, agreed to accept the jury panel after only a brief round of questioning. The prosecution, led by Deputy District Attorney Orville Emerson, promptly began to introduce evidence aimed at establishing Woods’ guilt in the murder of O'Shannon. The prosecution's case relied heavily on the sequence of events that transpired between the two women, and Detective J.A. Donohue took the stand as the first witness. He recounted the statements made by O'Shannon before her passing, detailing the argument that allegedly occurred between her and Woods. This testimony served as a critical foundation for the prosecution’s case, setting the stage for the jury to assess the validity of Woods' claims and the circumstances that led to O'Shannon's injuries.
Dr. A.F. Wagner, the autopsy surgeon assigned to Billie Maureen O'Shannon’s case, provided critical testimony regarding the injuries she sustained during the fatal altercation with Frances Woods. He revealed that O'Shannon had suffered three significant stab wounds, which ultimately led to severe complications. Wagner explained that these injuries resulted in peritonitis, a serious medical condition characterized by inflammation of the peritoneum, the thin layer of tissue that lines the abdominal wall and covers the abdominal organs.
Peritonitis can occur when bacteria or irritants enter the abdominal cavity, often due to puncture wounds from a knife or other sharp objects. In O'Shannon's case, the stab wounds likely introduced bacteria into her bloodstream or the peritoneal cavity, leading to an infection. This infection can spread rapidly, causing widespread inflammation and potentially leading to sepsis, a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body responds aggressively to an infection. The complications of peritonitis can be severe, as the inflamed tissue can interfere with the normal function of the abdominal organs, leading to organ failure.
Dr. Wagner's testimony underscored the grave nature of O'Shannon's injuries and was pivotal in the prosecution's argument against Woods. They contended that the nature and severity of the stab wounds indicated a calculated attack rather than an act of self-defense, as Woods claimed. The evidence presented by Dr. Wagner highlighted the deadly consequences of the confrontation and aimed to illustrate that Woods’s actions were not justifiable, further complicating her defense strategy.
The circumstances surrounding the fatal altercation between Billie Maureen O'Shannon and Frances Woods unfolded in a cloud of confusion and conflicting accounts, particularly regarding the contentious issue of marijuana. Before she succumbed to her injuries in General Hospital, O'Shannon rallied long enough to assert that the quarrel that preceded the attack revolved around marijuana. She recounted her outrage at the idea of smoking marijuana, stating, "I said anyone who would smoke a marijuana cigarette ought to have her face punched." This declaration painted Woods as the instigator of the violent encounter, according to O'Shannon's dying words. She described how Woods abruptly stopped the car, forcibly yanked her out, and then stabbed her with a long-bladed knife taken from her purse. The mention of marijuana also linked the tragic events to a party earlier that day at the apartment of John DeQuattro, the proprietor of the café where O'Shannon worked.
John DeQuattro himself was one of the first witnesses called to the stand, providing a glimpse into the atmosphere leading up to the altercation. He testified that both women had been drinking wine and beer at his establishment before their fateful ride. This detail highlighted the possible influence of alcohol on their behavior that night. In stark contrast to O'Shannon's assertions, Woods maintained that the conflict began with O'Shannon's aggressive behavior. During her testimony, she stated that she had first met O'Shannon and a mutual friend, Louis Pietro, at DeQuattro's café on the night of April 5. Woods claimed they all drank until closing time and then continued at DeQuattro’s apartment, where she described O'Shannon as "pretty drunk" by the time they left for home. Woods agreed to drive O'Shannon home but insisted that their journey took a violent turn without provocation.
As she defended herself in court, Woods' testimony sharply contrasted with O'Shannon's prior statements about their argument. While O'Shannon had alleged that marijuana had played a central role in their fight, Woods claimed that, although they had discussed "reefers," none had been consumed. Instead, she produced an empty Mexican cigarette case, asserting that it was the only related item present that evening. Woods argued that O'Shannon had ridiculed marijuana users, stating that she would "try anything once." According to Woods, while driving, O'Shannon unexpectedly struck her without explanation, prompting her to reach for a knife she had in her pocket for self-defense. Woods claimed, "I stopped the car, I got a knife I had in my pocket, and told her if she didn't let me alone, I would cut her." In a tragic turn of events, she stated that during their struggle, O'Shannon fell onto the knife, resulting in her injuries. This narrative aimed to frame Woods not as a murderer but as a victim of circumstance, acting out of self-preservation in the face of an unprovoked attack.
During the trial, Captain Stone's testimony added a significant dimension to the case. According to his statement, Miss Woods had admitted that the account given by Miss O'Shannon prior to her death was accurate. Captain Stone recounted how Woods, overwhelmed by emotion, expressed regret, stating that she was "sorry," before breaking down hysterically and exclaiming, "Billie, I would gladly change places with you." This dramatic outburst indicated a profound sense of remorse, further complicating the narrative of the events leading up to the fatal stabbing.
The prosecution presented evidence that Miss Woods had twice confessed to the stabbing but had later recanted these confessions. The complexity of Woods' admissions and subsequent denials suggested uncertainty or conflict in her recollection of the incident. According to the prosecution, Miss Woods had entered the café at 2900 South San Pedro Street on the night of April 6 to visit John De Quattro, a former friend and employer of Miss O'Shannon. The group, which included De Quattro and another man, spent the evening consuming drinks, before heading to De Quattro's apartment once Miss O'Shannon had finished work.
Deputy District Attorney Orville Emerson highlighted the fact that both women had been drinking heavily on the night of the altercation. He suggested to the jury that if they believed the two women were intoxicated at the time of the brawl, a manslaughter verdict would still fulfill the State’s legal requirements. This argument left room for the possibility that the crime, while severe, may not have been premeditated, but rather a result of an alcohol-fueled confrontation. The defense and prosecution, therefore, presented two vastly different interpretations of Miss Woods' actions, with the jury left to determine whether her actions were intentional or driven by circumstances beyond her control.
In his closing argument, Deputy District Attorney Orville Emerson faced the jury with the formidable task of navigating the complex emotions and legal implications surrounding the case. Acknowledging the shortcomings in the evidence, he conceded that there was insufficient proof to support a charge of premeditated murder. Instead, he urged the jury to consider a conviction for second-degree murder or manslaughter, framing the incident as one that, while tragic, lacked the necessary intent that would characterize a first-degree murder charge. Emerson’s appeal aimed to recalibrate the jurors' understanding of the events, focusing on the circumstances that led to the violent confrontation rather than the nuances of premeditation.
The jury, tasked with weighing the evidence presented during the trial, retired for deliberations at 9:30 am. After an extensive period of reflection and discussion, they returned the following day at 11:50 am to deliver a disheartening announcement: they could not reach a unanimous verdict on Miss Woods' guilt or innocence. It was reported that the actual deliberation time amounted to less than six hours, indicating that the jurors grappled with the complexities of the case, particularly the varying accounts of the incident and the motivations behind each woman's actions.
While the precise leanings of the jury remained ambiguous, it was revealed that the panel, consisting of ten men and two women, was deadlocked with a vote of seven to five. This split suggested a significant division in opinion, highlighting the challenges the jurors faced in reconciling the evidence and the conflicting narratives presented throughout the trial. In light of this stalemate, Judge Scott declared a mistrial. He subsequently set Miss Woods' bail at $2,500, allowing her temporary release from custody. Additionally, Judge Scott ordered Miss Woods to appear before Superior Judge Clarence L. Kincaid on July 18 to establish a new trial date, leaving the door open for further legal proceedings in the contentious case.
Aug 18, 1938:
On August 18, authorities issued a bench warrant for Frances Marie Woods, who had been reported missing for over two weeks. The warrant was authorized by Superior Judge Clarence L. Kincaid after bail bondsmen notified the court that Woods had failed to check in since August 1. At the time of her disappearance, Woods was out on a $3,500 bond, a result of her initial trial for murder that took place on July 14, where the jury could not reach a unanimous decision regarding her guilt or innocence.
The situation surrounding Woods' disappearance added an additional layer of complexity to her ongoing legal battle. She was scheduled for a retrial on the murder charge on August 24, a critical moment that could determine her future. The gap between her initial trial and the upcoming retrial, coupled with her sudden absence, raised concerns among her legal team, family, and the authorities. Her disappearance not only hindered her ability to prepare for her defense but also highlighted the gravity of the charges against her and the ongoing legal repercussions she faced.
As the search for Woods intensified, questions arose regarding her state of mind leading up to her disappearance. Her absence during this pivotal time left many speculating about the reasons for her flight and what implications it might have on her forthcoming trial. The situation became a matter of urgency for the legal system, as they sought to locate her and ensure her presence in court for the critical proceedings ahead.
Aug 31, 1938:
On August 31, Superior Judge Frank M. Smith made the decision to postpone the retrial of Frances Marie Woods, which had originally been scheduled for August 24. The postponement was prompted by the absence of Miss Woods' attorney, who was engaged in other legal matters, highlighting the complexities often faced in court scheduling. Judge Smith’s ruling underscored the importance of having a fully prepared legal representation in such a serious case, where the stakes were significantly high due to the murder charges against Woods.
The judge reset the trial date for September 14, allowing additional time for both the defense and prosecution to prepare their cases adequately. This delay was critical not only for Miss Woods to ensure her attorney could devote the necessary attention to her defense, but also for the prosecution to re-evaluate their strategy in light of the first trial's inconclusive outcome. The extended timeline provided an opportunity for both sides to gather further evidence, witness testimonies, and refine their arguments in anticipation of a more definitive ruling.
As the new date approached, it was likely that both the court and Miss Woods’ legal team faced mounting pressure. The case had already drawn significant public interest, and the delay could further intensify scrutiny regarding the circumstances surrounding the tragic events that led to the murder charge. In a legal climate where reputations and lives were at stake, the decision to postpone the retrial reflected a commitment to ensuring a fair judicial process.
Sept 14, 1938:
On September 14, 1938, Frances Marie Woods faced her second trial for murder in the courtroom of Superior Judge Frank M. Smith. The proceedings came after the first trial ended in a hung jury, underscoring the contentious nature of the case. This time, the jury was composed of eight men and four women, reflecting a balanced representation as they prepared to deliberate on the serious charges against Woods.
The atmosphere in the courtroom became charged when a juror, Mrs. Ruby F. Duel, made a startling revelation at the beginning of the morning session. She disclosed that a stranger had approached her on the street at Third Street and Broadway, specifically to discuss the trial. The woman had identified Mrs. Duel as a juror and expressed unsolicited opinions about Frances Woods, stating, “I hear the defendant is a nice girl,” and adding, “She didn’t mean to do any wrong.” This unexpected encounter raised immediate concerns about the integrity of the jury process and the potential influence of external opinions on the jurors' impartiality.
In response to this incident, Judge Smith excused Mrs. Duel from the jury to maintain the fairness of the trial. Mrs. Violet Giles, an alternate juror, was then sworn in to take her place. Although the judge offered the option to declare a mistrial due to the incident, defense attorney Donald McKay declined, believing it was possible to proceed without jeopardizing the trial's integrity. This decision reflected McKay’s confidence in the remaining jurors and his strategy to focus on presenting a robust defense for Miss Woods.
During her first trial, Woods had described the altercation that led to the fatal stabbing as a struggle, wherein both women rolled on the ground in a fierce confrontation. This narrative was pivotal in shaping the defense’s argument that she acted in self-defense. As the second trial commenced, it was clear that the testimonies and perceptions of the jurors would play a critical role in determining the outcome of the case, especially in light of the unexpected incident involving Mrs. Duel. The courtroom dynamics suggested a heightened awareness among the jurors of the responsibilities they bore in ensuring a just verdict, particularly given the public interest surrounding the trial.
In his opening address to the jury, Deputy District Attorney Orville Emerson outlined the prosecution’s case against Frances Marie Woods, asserting that she had stabbed her friend, Miss O'Shannon, to death following a heated argument about a marijuana cigarette. Emerson emphasized the circumstances surrounding the altercation, aiming to establish that the stabbing was not a mere accident but a deliberate act fueled by the quarrel. He sought to paint a vivid picture of the confrontation, intending to convince the jury that the evidence would support a conviction of murder.
Defense Attorney Donald McKay, countering Emerson's claims, reaffirmed that his defense would rely on the assertion of self-defense, mirroring his strategy from the previous trial. He suggested that Miss Woods acted out of necessity to protect herself during a dangerous confrontation with Miss O'Shannon. McKay's approach aimed to elicit sympathy from the jury by framing Woods as a victim caught in a precarious situation rather than a perpetrator of violence.
The courtroom proceedings took a critical turn when Radio Officer H. Compton was called as the first witness. He recounted his arrival at the scene of the altercation, observing Miss Woods administering first aid to the injured Miss O'Shannon. Compton noted that Woods appeared "perfectly calm" as she tended to her friend, which could indicate a lack of panic or guilt in the immediate aftermath of the incident. He recalled that Woods claimed to be a nurse and insisted that a man was responsible for the stabbing, shifting the blame away from herself. This testimony aimed to establish a narrative of innocence, suggesting that Miss Woods was not only attempting to help but was also disclosing crucial information about the true assailant.
Another responding officer, LH Montgomery, provided further details about the chaotic scene, adding to the jury's understanding of the events that unfolded that night. Montgomery's testimony would serve to corroborate or challenge the accounts given by Miss Woods and others involved, as he described the circumstances and any evidence he observed upon arrival. The foundation laid by these testimonies would be pivotal in shaping the jury's perception of Miss Woods' actions and intentions, influencing the outcome of the trial as it progressed.
During the murder trial of Frances Marie Woods, new and damaging evidence emerged in Judge Frank M. Smith's courtroom that significantly impacted the prosecution's case. William D. Prater, a witness who lived directly across from the scene of the altercation, testified that he had seen Miss Woods repeatedly stabbing her friend, Miss O'Shannon. Prater explained that on the morning of the incident, he had stepped outside to head to work when he noticed a car parked across the street. As he observed the unfolding struggle, he saw Miss Woods’ arm rise and fall multiple times in a violent manner, striking Miss O'Shannon. Alarmed by what he was witnessing, Prater rushed across the street to intervene, only to see a knife in Miss Woods' hand.
Prater recounted a haunting moment just before Miss O'Shannon collapsed. As she fell to the ground, bleeding profusely from severe wounds to her chest, abdomen, and neck, she uttered a puzzling remark: “I never did anything like that in my life.” In her last moments, she pleaded, “Please call an ambulance.” This desperate cry for help indicated her awareness of the severity of her injuries. Prater, acting quickly, hurried to his home to call for medical assistance, highlighting the urgency of the situation.
Another witness, Jimmie Zouras, corroborated Prater's testimony. He described arriving on the scene shortly after the stabbing and confirmed that the two women had been standing throughout the entire fight. When the police arrived, they discovered Miss O'Shannon lying on the ground, gravely injured and bleeding from knife wounds to her throat and breast. Officer W.E. Huston, one of the first responders, testified that he found Miss Woods standing over the fallen victim and heard her admit, “I did the cutting.” This admission directly contradicted Miss Woods' testimony from her previous trial, where she claimed, “I didn’t stab her. She fell on the knife after I dropped it.” The contrasting accounts added complexity to the proceedings and served to undermine Woods' defense, casting a shadow over her claims of self-defense and further complicating her fight for acquittal.
In a gripping revelation during the trial of Frances Marie Woods, a dying statement from Miss O'Shannon provided a chilling account of the events leading to the fatal stabbing. Police Captain Stone testified that as Miss O'Shannon lay mortally wounded, she recounted an argument sparked by Miss Woods offering her a marijuana cigarette. O'Shannon claimed she half-jokingly responded, "Anyone who'd smoke marijuana should be punched in the nose," a comment that ignited Miss Woods' fury. According to her statement, Woods abruptly stopped the car and challenged O'Shannon, saying, "All right. Let's see you do it." The confrontation escalated violently as Woods produced a knife and began cutting O'Shannon.
Captain Stone's testimony painted a vivid picture of Miss O'Shannon's defiance even in her final moments. Despite the grave nature of her injuries, O'Shannon vowed to "get even" with Miss Woods, suggesting a deep-seated anger and sense of betrayal. The emotional weight of her words resonated in the courtroom, emphasizing the dramatic and personal nature of the conflict between the two women.
Adding to the prosecution's case, Miss Josephine Waite, a friend of Miss O'Shannon, recalled a poignant moment at the bedside of the dying girl. After the stabbing, police brought Miss Woods to the hospital, where Miss O'Shannon shared her version of events with Waite. O'Shannon reiterated that the argument had begun when Miss Woods reached for a marijuana cigarette in the glove compartment of her car. The witness recounted that O'Shannon expressed her disapproval of marijuana use, prompting a heated response from Woods. Waite testified that O'Shannon described how the altercation escalated: "Do you want to start something?" Woods reportedly asked before the fight erupted. Waite detailed how Miss Woods approached O'Shannon with the knife in hand, initiating the attack before O'Shannon could defend herself. This testimony provided crucial context for the jury, illustrating the rapid escalation of what began as a verbal disagreement into a deadly confrontation.
During the trial of Frances Marie Woods, Deputy District Attorney Orville Emerson made a strong case against her, labeling the fatal stabbing of Miss O'Shannon as a "deliberate premeditated murder." Emerson emphasized the testimonies of prosecution witnesses who claimed that Miss Woods had exited her vehicle with a knife drawn, coolly and intentionally beginning her assault on O'Shannon before the latter had any chance to defend herself. The prosecution argued that this premeditation was further underscored by Miss Woods's possession of a "spring blade death knife" along with an assortment of other knives found in her car, suggesting a readiness to resort to violence.
As the prosecution rested its case, they notably chose not to call John De Quattro, the employer of Miss O'Shannon, to testify. De Quattro had previously appeared as a state witness in the earlier trial, where his testimony played a pivotal role. This time, however, defense attorney Donald McKay called De Quattro as the first witness for the defense. In his testimony, De Quattro provided insight into the events leading up to the tragic incident. He revealed that Miss O'Shannon had been intoxicated while working and that she, along with Woods and another man, Leo Prieto, had left the cafe to spend time at De Quattro's apartment.
De Quattro's account included an important clarification regarding the discussion of marijuana at the apartment. He testified that the only mention of marijuana smoking occurred when Prieto jokingly pulled out some Mexican cigarettes and referred to them as marijuana. Miss O'Shannon had playfully replied that she would "try anything once," framing the conversation as lighthearted and devoid of any serious intent to provoke a conflict. This testimony aimed to shift the narrative away from the prosecution's portrayal of a premeditated attack, suggesting instead that the altercation arose from a series of miscommunications and a volatile atmosphere fueled by alcohol, rather than a calculated act of violence.
Sept 15, 1938:
On September 15, 1938, Frances Marie Woods took the stand in her own defense during her murder trial, reiterating the self-defense narrative she had presented in her previous trial, which ended in a jury disagreement. Woods recounted the events leading up to the fatal encounter with Miss O'Shannon, emphasizing that she had only drawn the spring blade knife, which she had purchased the day before, in response to an escalating physical confrontation. According to Woods, the altercation began when Miss O'Shannon started to physically assault her, landing punches in a struggle that led to chaos.
Woods described a desperate scenario in which she felt threatened and claimed that in the heat of the struggle, Miss O'Shannon had fallen onto the knife. She portrayed herself as a victim who, facing a larger and more aggressive opponent, was forced to defend herself. Her defense attorney, Donald McKay, passionately urged the jury to accept Woods’s account of the incident. He pointed out the physical disparity between the two women, emphasizing Woods's smaller stature in comparison to O'Shannon. McKay argued that the knife was drawn purely out of self-defense and that Woods had no intention of harming O'Shannon until she was first attacked with fists.
The defense's strategy hinged on portraying Woods as someone who was caught in an untenable situation, forced to react to an unprovoked assault. McKay's appeal to the jury was a plea not only for justice but also for understanding the nuances of the confrontation, framing Miss Woods as a reluctant participant who had resorted to the knife only when she felt her life was in danger. This narrative aimed to humanize Woods and shift the perception of the jury from that of a calculated attacker to that of a terrified young woman forced to defend herself against a stronger adversary.
Sept 16, 1938:
The following day, the jury reached a verdict in the trial of Frances Marie Woods, ultimately finding her not guilty of the murder of Billie O'Shannon. The decision marked a significant turning point in a case that had captured public attention and involved complex testimonies regarding self-defense, intoxication, and the circumstances surrounding the fatal altercation. The acquittal brought a sense of relief to Woods, who had spent months navigating the legal system under the shadow of serious charges. The jury's decision reflected a belief in her account of the events, acknowledging the chaotic nature of the confrontation that led to O'Shannon's death.
Despite the conclusion of the trial, information regarding Frances Marie Woods remains elusive. The challenges in uncovering further details stem from the prevalence of women sharing her name, which complicates the search for specific biographical information. As various records and reports document multiple individuals with the same name, distinguishing Woods from others has proven difficult. Consequently, this lack of clarity leaves significant gaps in understanding her life post-trial, the impact of the incident on her future, and any subsequent events that may have followed her acquittal. The absence of information creates an enigmatic aura around Frances Marie Woods, raising questions about her journey after the tumultuous legal battle and how she moved forward after such a life-altering experience.
Lillian May Akers:
Lillian May Akers was born on November 9, 1915, in Alpaugh, located in Tulare County, California. She was the daughter of Frank Jackson Akers (1872–1933) and Mary Boswell Bradlee (1876–1937), who played significant roles in shaping her early life. Growing up in a large family, Lillian was one of several siblings, including Margaret E. Bradlee, Martha Anne Bradlee, and LeRoy Winston Akers, among others. Her family also included notable relatives, such as her aunts, Miss Ann Boswell of San Francisco and Mrs. E. Moran of Fresno, which suggests a close-knit familial network.
Lillian May Akers went by the name Billie Maureen Akers O'Shannon, a name that perhaps reflects her connection to her family's legacy as well as her identity. She had numerous siblings, such as Verlie Alice "Bunnie" Akers Johnson, Nadine Mary Akers Erickson, and William "Albert" Akers. Other siblings included Martha Ann Akers Davis, George Akers, Daniel T. Akers, Robert Akers, Frank Jackson "Jack" Akers Jr., Alvin Akers, and Clinton Herbert Akers. This extensive family tree indicates a vibrant familial background, filled with relationships that likely influenced her life choices.
Tragically, Lillian May Akers passed away on April 15, 1938, in Los Angeles, California, at a young age. Despite her contributions and the connections she had in life, she does not have a grave marker to commemorate her memory. Her name appears on FindAGrave, where she is listed as "Lillian May 'Billy O'Shannon Akers." The lack of a marker may suggest a history of hardship or simply the passing of time, but it also emphasizes the need to remember and honor individuals like Lillian who were part of a larger narrative, marked by familial ties and personal experiences that shaped their lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment